| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (7)

Posted: Nov 22nd 2008 12:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Why do you think that "it would seem to be to everyone's benefit if premium accounts represented better overall value" (With emphasis on "everyone")?

For me, my premium account gives me:

An insurance policy that if I ever have a problem with my account, I can get help.

The convenience of having tier for land charged directly to a debit card, as opposed to having to remember to pay an SL landlord. OTOH, I'm paying excess tier. I haven't decided yet if that is a problem. The drop in the price of mainland parcels doesn't worry me, I consider all this to be "entertainment expense."

Stipend to me is a rebate on the charge of my account fee. If that is lowered, I'm going to expect something of equal or greater worth *to me* in exchange.
Reply

Posted: Nov 22nd 2008 4:33AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am not sure about your assumption about the benefits of premium accounts for Linden Lab. Those revenues currently contribute a very small portion to their overall income and - give the "everything in entertainment must be free" attitude of most consumers (especially when looking at the internet) - I doubt, that it is easy to define a premium product, which is more popular, yet does not cost Linden Lab too much. I have some 4 or 5 premium account running currently for technical reasons. I think, they represent good value for money. But I am rather alone with that attitude when talking with "normal" residents.

If I look back at the development of SL's society, it seems, as if this fits the the trend: Most accounts are "casual users" these days and over time I expect this to be even more pronounced when OpenSim grids become a kind of 3D websites spread over the Metaverse. Casual users tend not to like subscription models as they never know in advance, how intense they will use a service . Other platforms - like MMORPGs - have success with subscription based models. But those platforms cater to "intense users" who know in advance, that they will spend many hours inworld each month. 10 or 15$/month seems money well spend to them.

This "thinking about premiums" seems to be another sign of Linden Lab not knowing, which general direction the company should go with the platform. This is understandable, given their current situation and the complicated market - but not very reassuring.
Reply

Posted: Nov 22nd 2008 12:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I (and many others) figured the stipend into our cost analysis of getting a premium account. Removing the stipend and I would definitely need to take another look at those figures. I would probably decide to be landless and mooch off the system, plus I would have cut most of my ties preventing me from going to one of their competitors.
Reply

Posted: Nov 23rd 2008 1:03AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Call me cynical - because I am - but I sense the first step in seeing Premium Account Fees changing. And that change is unlikely to be downward. Any company wanting to increase its fees for a service starts by looking at the current benefits and then adding more. But they want to have "value added" benefits, because giving customers more for the same price is, for want of a better word, unprofitable.

My guess is that by April 2009 we'll see a new set of prices, one of which may be the current Premium, but with others that include benefits relative to the price you pay. You want the "no-frills? It's $80 per year. You want first 1028m land tier free? That's $90 per year. No, I'm not going to guess the structures, I'm just speculating that this is where it will go: Tiered Premiums based of fee-per-service.
Reply

Posted: Nov 23rd 2008 10:10PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
in short term their profit margins might decrease, but as long as it doesn't get negative, if the additional benefits attract more customer, in the long term, they will be making more money

and depending on what they change, it might even be somthing that they at most have to pay for the costs involving the development of the feature, and after it is done, it migth not cost them anything while still attracting more customers
Reply

Posted: Nov 25th 2008 9:28AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I pay for my mainland server space in Second Life. And I have done so since 2005. This new initiative to improve premium accounts is just lip service. Printing up a few more Lindens is not going to begin to address the issues Linden Lab has with it's mainland product.
Reply

Posted: Dec 2nd 2008 1:01AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The stipend really isn't that big a deal, but take it away and we will definitely want more value for the money. If you have a business, which is the usual purpose for buying mainland, the stipend is usually gone in advertising fees or payment to staff. If the stipend ended up being more than the value of the premium subscription, I would question it, but even then, LL makes their money on tier. The subscription fee that LL makes after stipends is a marginal amount of money. Paying stipends at the current rate wouldn't break LL's back.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Storyboard: Over, done, finished, finito

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 9:00PM

Betawatch: February 4 - 10, 2012

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 8:00PM

The Firing Line: Controller wars edition

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 1:00PM

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW