The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 119 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Nov 8th 2008 7:21PM (Unverified) said
The basic problem being that if you allow the world to change based on player actions, then only a tiny percentage of hardcore players will ever see your story (everyone else will only see the after effects).
But if you don't allow the world to change, then everyone gets to see the story, but suspension of disbelief gets stretched to its breaking point which ruins emotional involvement in the story (players are told that their actions have an effect, but when the players return to an area, nothing has changed).
The usual way that game designers get around this problem is to instance portions of the content (or "phasing" which is just a variation on instancing). But, as I was alluding to above by saying "true MMO", the more you instance, the less your game is really an MMO.