The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 129 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (3)
Posted: Aug 20th 2008 3:31PM (Unverified) said
Never again for me.
Typical MMO:
"3 Warriors LFG with Healer!"
"3 Warriors LFG with Healer!"
"4 Warriors LFG with Healer!"
"4 Warriors LFG with Healer!"
"4 Warriors LFG with Healer!"
"5 Warriors LFG with Healer!"
"Great, thanks for joining us! Okay Pull!"
"WTF HEALER WHAT ARE YOU DOING!?!?!? WE ONLY HAD 14 ADDS YOU CAN'T KEEP UP?!?!?!?"
"WAIT DON'T LEAVE WE'LL TRY AGAIN"
"5 Warriors LFG with Healer!"
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 3:14AM (Unverified) said
This article might screw the people that end up playing a Warrior Priest or Archmage though.
The tanks and DPS are again, as usual, going to assume that any Warrior Priest or Archmage are healers, or should heal, leaving their non-healer masteries unwanted by groups.
Hopefully this doesn't happen, but it has in just about every MMO. DAoC's been running 5-6 years 'ish and still no one plays Smite Clerics.
Posted: Aug 21st 2008 6:09AM (Unverified) said
In Midgard, Healers had multiple roles to play. They were main CC as well as the main heal class for the realm. In Hibernia, you had buff druids as well as heal druids (pet druids were the overlooked line of that class). People didn't stop playing smite because they couldn't get groups. They stopped playing smite because it wasn't a wizard in chain anymore.