| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (6)

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 12:12PM Twinkle Tits said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
Wow rarely have I seen such bad and dated graphics, do you have to pay per month to play this crap ? Even if they gave it away for free I would pass.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 1:48PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The reason you've rarely seen graphics this bad is because games are rarely still turning out expansions 10 years after release.
Reply

Posted: Aug 16th 2008 2:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
That's why the expansion isn't really aimed at you. They tried the graphics update, back at expansion 3 in 2001. It worked, but it drove off players who couldn't run it at the time on computers that had worked just months before.

Everquest just isn't about the shiny graphics. For that, I'm glad. It means more time to focus on grouping, roleplaying, chilling out with friends, and even hard core raiding.
Reply

Posted: Aug 24th 2008 5:24PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
yes.. it would look dated... being 10 years old and all.

And for a good 5 years.. the only one worth subscribing to... and yes, if you were old enough, you would have payed your monthly sub.
Reply

Posted: Aug 17th 2008 12:53AM eipxen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Having never seen screens or video of everquest before, I feel like the graphics are not as bad as I expected

they seem kind of dated and low-res, but far from ugly, which (considering the age of the game) I think is a credit to pretty good design, art wise
Reply

Posted: Aug 19th 2008 4:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Looks like clerics gonna get screw with this new expansion...
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW