Currently in WoW, the max level is 70. After Wrath of the Lich King, it will climb to 80 and who knows how much further after that. In GW, the level cap is at 20 and will always stay at 20, at least with the current Guild Wars. This is daunting to many WoW players as that level progression is a big part of the game for them. Many people thrive on that numerical measurement of their achievement, and when it is not there in GW, it becomes a deal-breaker.
However, the point of that level 20 cap goes beyond the simplicity of progressing just for that higher number next to your name. Guild Wars was originally created to focus on game play and not so much character development. With an easily-achievable goal of level 20 only a few dozen hours into the game, you can focus on so many other aspects of the game such as storyline advancement, dungeons, high-level zones and skill hunting, to name a few. Plus, as many WoW players know, when you can't play with your friends because they're 10 levels below you, it kills that whole socialization and fun thing. GW eliminates that with a quick leveling system that is there to merely introduce you to the rest of the game.
Continue on with world travel>>
Reader Comments (3)
Posted: Jul 31st 2008 12:31PM arnavdesai said
This is easily one of the best features of GW and I shudder to think why they are removing it in GW2. However, that being said, I have faith in the amazing team at Anet and hope they do a good job. I took up this game as my first MMORPG(because it was free) & I loved every minute of it till my guild started leaving one by one.
If you have a regular grouping guild in GW it's fun or else the content might seem to limiting in nature.
Reply
If you have a regular grouping guild in GW it's fun or else the content might seem to limiting in nature.
Posted: Jul 31st 2008 9:41PM cray said
I actually wish Guild Wars would do away with whole numerical measurement and just have adjective rankings. You can say I'm a Mighty Paladin, Which would be like saying I have level 13 Warrior/Monk.
They could just have adjective rankings for each level or skip a few levels for a ranking. The duel professions could also get morphed into one description. wherein a Warrior/Monk is a Paladin, a Monk/Warrior would be a Disciple.
Reply
They could just have adjective rankings for each level or skip a few levels for a ranking. The duel professions could also get morphed into one description. wherein a Warrior/Monk is a Paladin, a Monk/Warrior would be a Disciple.
Posted: Aug 1st 2008 1:13PM Nmaster64 said
So amazing, this is what makes the game so much more accessible. I don't have to sacrifice a social life or put in months to play along with everybody else.
And anybody who thinks hitting level 20 puts you right on par with seasoned level 20s is very, very, very wrong.
Reply
And anybody who thinks hitting level 20 puts you right on par with seasoned level 20s is very, very, very wrong.
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.
Featured Stories
The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 147 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 85 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
- Star Trek Online unpacks Cardassian mystery boxes 57 comments
- Meet the guild that's lasted over 16 years 54 comments







