| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (3)

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 1:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree... that clever comment is PR gold, the old "we tried, but this event is bigger than all of us" chestnut ... but I wonder which users you think have done it better? I've not seen any event that represents all of SL ... then again, I don't get out much either ;)

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 7:02AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Honestly - Big P admits they might have made a bit of a mistake and gets hammered for it. We all know it was badly done but it still happened. Lets call a truce here people and see you at SL10B. And M Linden (tm probably) seems more and more human, for a CEO :)

Posted: Jun 24th 2008 12:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Tateru, I understand that you find the thought of a "corporate showcase" evil, and anaethema to all creatures creative and sensitive and true, but...isn't massively.com a corporation? Isn't it a corporate showcase, too? Aren't *you* part of a corporate showcase? Or does it somehow sanitize the "corporate" part of the showcase if games are the thing shown, and not, oh, social groups or educational groups or businesses?

If Linden Lab were to go on indulging their beta-test love-feast partners of yore, how fast or how much do you think SL would grow? Do you think it could endlessly collect fringe groups from around the world and "rule"? And still pay the bills?

If LL changes to becoming more corporate-conscious to have corporations buy their islands and eventually, move to a business model where they will hook up those with the capacity to run their own servers at an enterprise or business level, and not just an individual consumer level, why would you object? That's what IT companies have to do. They don't generally remain scrappy little start-ups, they are bought by bigger entities. They can't run on VC funds forever.

Why is it that those who push SL to a mainstream, starting with LL itself, overcoming its Burning Man days, are considered the "conservatives," but those clinging to its wacky beta past are considered "progressives"?

I think there is still plenty of room for anybody to express any kind of culture they wish in SL, there's 20,000 plus sims, lots of new ones for sale cheap, and you don't have to look at the other people you don't like and their cultures you find unacceptable if business -- or for that matter furry or Gorean -- isn't your thing.

I know you find it compelling to conceive of a world run by leftists and counter-culturalists and geeks, but I think even when Obama is elected in the U.S., you will see this doesn't work out as planned , there are always compromises that must be made to have a diverse and inclusive world -- and that doesn't mean allowing the public commons to be hijacked by special interests like Goreans and child avatars.

I'm supportive of what Philip said, and I don't think it was meant as some kind of squirrely evasion of the problems around the birthday -- he acknowledged there was protest and angst, and what more can he say about it? They don't chose to be whipsawed by special interests even though they can appreciate diversity.

Featured Stories

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW