The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 129 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Jun 19th 2008 3:23PM Anatidae said
MMOs are tricky. In the case of AoC, they have developed 3 games. A single player game, a multiplayer game, and an "end game". I wish developers could figure out how to drop us all into "end game" and just focus on that only because I have a feeling that it would be the best MMO ever.
Personally, I was hoping for more from AoC. I dislike the trend of MMOs adding more and more single player play. In AoC I feel as though I am playing my game along side of thousands of others... but alone really.
On the other end, City of Heroes (even in it's aging state) allows for easy grouping. The whole sidekick system lets you stick with your friends or find a PuG rather quickly.
Anyway. I digress. AoC has a cool look, but the gameplay is not really thought out that well. Sometimes I think it would be a better single player game. They released to take advantage of the gap since so many other MMOs are launching this fall, but in the long run they might suffer the same fate as Sigil's Vanguard.