The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 116 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Jun 17th 2008 2:31PM Anatidae said
What they really want is a piece of the streaming entertainment pie. You see, all TV and movie rentals will be internet sourced within 10 years max (probably 5) and the traditional cable will start fading away. So, if AT&T can cap downloads and then start charging more after a certain amount, then they have the potential to gain billions from overages when everyone gets on the internet TV bandwagon.
I don't have cable anymore, I just go to the networks and download their shows. My living room entertainment center is now just another monitor on a media PC. It seriously rocks and works great. I even stream shows like Lost in HD. I love it.
Of course, AT&T just wants me to pay them something for doing that (even known I am on Comcast at the moment as I wait for FIOS to drop here) because it is likely that some of that traffic crosses over their massive network.