| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (2)

Posted: Jun 9th 2008 2:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Heh, I was there for the releases of both DAoC and WoW. In dark ages the Albs outnumbered both midguard and hibernia 2 to one, and it only got worse as people got sick of being "alb zerged". This was mainly attributed to the sorcerers ability to "chain stun" whole groups in rvr, giving them a glaring advantage.
In wow the alliance started off with about 30% more players across the board. Thankfully once all 8 bazillion night elf huntards got tired of waiting two hours to get in a battleground they rerolled over to horde and it balanced out on at least a few servers. (Although I know for a fact bloodhoof is 3 to 1 alliance and zangarmarsh is 2 to 1 horde) so discrepancies exist.
The great thing about them using warhammer as the IP is there really aren't any "boring" races in warhammer. Myself im torn between being a dwarf or a greenskin. A few of my friends are loudly arguing about chaos or imperial, with a few holdout darkelf drizzt nerds. If I get to play a goblin though......man I don't know if I can resist hehe

Posted: Jun 9th 2008 3:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Hopefully they'll find a better way to balance than DAoC did, which was amp up Hibernia to the point that they could rollover anyone. Then the population shifts over to Hibernia and there's another balance issue, but Hibernia is overpowered. Mythic consistently overcompensated for balance issues, especially with new expansions.

Also on no race being boring, I completely agree danarchy. Never have I wanted to play a dwarf, or an orc, but Warhammer has done a good job in making me consider them. My favorite classes happen to be from the elves and chaos though.
Reply

Featured Stories

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW