The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 120 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (2)
Posted: Jun 5th 2008 4:57PM Slob Zombie said
The difference here is that the former makes it less fun for gankers (who deserve to have as much fun as the guy collecting alligator eyeballs) while the latter is making it more fun for the people pissed off at the gankers, which afterall is who this system is for. So make it so there's a benefit to being a ganker-hunter instead of penalizing ganking.
If slicing up a lowbie gives me a debuff, I'm going to stop slicing him, but I'm also going to be having less fun and quitting this game. On the other hand, if a posse of vigilantes came riding over the hill looking for me... Well now you've got my subscription dollars cuz that right there is awesome.
Posted: Jun 9th 2008 10:02AM (Unverified) said
The whole goal is to make these "consequences" just as fun to live with as being a law abiding citizen. I love running from the law in Oblivion, maybe even killing a guard here and there. Eventually I always get caught and usually killed or I pay off the guards. But then I no longer have a bounty and its back to square 1.
Bottom line: MAKE IT FUN!