| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (2)

Posted: May 17th 2008 8:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Even if players accepted this (which they wouldn't), how would the tax work? Could you not zone if you didn't have any money? Probably not, but then is it a percent of your money, a flat rate, or a progressive tax? All this would do is encourage people to keep an alt with the majority of their money while they only keep a bare minimum.

It's an interesting idea, but outside that it wouldn't really help.
Reply

Posted: May 17th 2008 9:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think that this would ultimately bring about a lot more gold buying. For instance, if you travel around a LOT depending on what you have to do in the game- you could potentially lose more money through tolls than through armor repair. If it becomes a bigger money sinkhole than armor repairs than gold buying might become more and more appealing.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Storyboard: Over, done, finished, finito

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 9:00PM

Betawatch: February 4 - 10, 2012

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 8:00PM

The Firing Line: Controller wars edition

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 1:00PM

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW