I'd like to see better content classification. All I see now is Mature or PG. What prevents people with many "paid" and "old" alt accounts from casting more than one vote through their alts? Do people get graded based on their past accuracy? I mean, I go in and flag content as mature. A Linden takes a look as says - no, this is PG. So, is that available somewhere that the Lindens can see who has flagged it, and what their past accuracy has been? This may help to prevent people from abusing the system if they can be punished when swarming with a group of people to flag content. Why don't we make people pay L$ to vote against a listing? If their vote was reasonable, they get the L$ back, else lose the L$ to the person who listed the item. What if we see a reasonable classification? Can we vote on it to confirm that it is valid? (X out of N people classify this listing as correct). Also are we getting back to the classification system of who is privileged here? Many people with basic accounts can not go premium due to their country/location. The Lindens are apparently closing the doors on them.
Reader Comments (1)
Posted: May 5th 2008 12:47PM (Unverified) said