| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (3)

Posted: Apr 27th 2008 11:11PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well new and old MMORTS games allowed players to dictate the story - though they didnt usually officialise it or report it in any structured manner. Many have flirted with player created models and the current batch in development are very hot on this.

coming from the original UT community - I can only say that it was eden for player created content. Superb ability mixed with original creativity on many occasions and kept the game fresh to the extent the original version of UT has as much activity as later versions.

The advent of senates and in game developer presence will lead to more player activity and content, similar to Eve's elections but very strongly linked to ingame power and achievment. The dynamic this will produce will be interesting when compared to the impact of elections on MMOG's like Eve.

I have always deplored and refused to play MMORPG games that dont involve player owned property and a non linear storylines. WoW had no chance with no perma death - therfore no risk and no fun. DDO came too late and didnt go far enough. To me, the ability to create a stronghold and be attacked wouldbe crucial in any duplication of the paper and dice role playing games I played for 20 years+.
Reply

Posted: Apr 28th 2008 4:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If secondlife tm were to work as one would hope, you would have the tools to create all the other MMO's within SL. Im finding more and more content creators making products that allow the users to modify to their liking. I bought a pair of converse shoes that allowed me to change the colours on every bit of the shoes.

I see there is maybe becoming a community of "content creators" in SL and a community of "Players" The Content creators are making SL tm more playable and accesable to the Players of SL.


Reply

Posted: Apr 29th 2008 4:35AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Indeed user generated content is the way to go - BUT - within worlds like wow the users _are_ the content.

All virtual worlds need some protections against immersion destroying elements, be they user or commerce generated. In SL this can be a very hands off approach, as the purpose of the world is for unstructured play where local structure can be improvised by the residents. In worlds such as this, editing and censure of user generated content can and should be light.

Within specific purpose worlds such as wow and co, the consistancy of the experience is paramount. User generated content should be highly controlled and restricted to ensure the experience remains immersive to players. Secondlife's strength in user generated experiences would be wow's weakness; as our SL experience shows, not everyone has the same idea of immersion as we. The choice of world and development of character within it is the primary creative experience within such worlds. Without a solid framework for this to happen within, this character development becomes difficult.

We see this also within the roleplay communities within secondlife itself. RP sims enforce extra rulesets atop SL's general TOS about what is appropriate. Consensus on what constitutes good content is made before entry - like chosing an external world with a fantasy structure you wish to play in, choosing the rules is part of the game. Certain types of immersion require strong enforcement of style and limitations on legal actions. The more solid the immersive experience, the more these elements must be taken out of the hands of everyone and managed by a central team.

Some user generated content _is_ part of the future of MMO games, but not a lot. Finding out strategies to give players freedom over content, whilst conserving immersive strengths of rich centrally designed worlds is a difficult problem. One that will be a key element to the next evolution of MMO games.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW