The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 152 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 85 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 75 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 63 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Apr 17th 2008 10:31AM (Unverified) said
City of Heroes is the other way around. The end game content is negligable, aside from badge-hunting, PvP and recipie snaring, your 50's are really only good for helping other heroes progress. And with the sidekick system, level doesn't really matter for people to play together.
Neither way is perfect - if they were, the game would be fun all the way through and then some. You'd want to play the beginning as much as the end. But still, I think this whole abstraction of levelling and linear progression through these games is really going to start showing their seams as players want more dynamic content.
Could you imagine an MMO where your level doesn't matter nearly as much as what you've experienced?
I have a concept: What if your character was proficient only at zones you took time to conquer? What if you fought all the creatures in the Alpha Caves such that they became easy, but someone over in Beta Forest would have a problem with them, due to some mechanic of unfamiliarity? Seasoned characters wouldn't be high in level, but rather versed in the whole virtual world.
Bah. Even that sounds like a grind. Carry on, I have no solutions.