| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (10)

Posted: Apr 14th 2008 1:36PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The researcher had a follow-up column on GameSpot you may want to check out where he mentioned that the point of the study was not to draw parallels between gamers and people with Asperger's, but rather to point out that people afflicted with Asperger's may be especially susceptible to becoming addicted to online games.

Quote: "The point about Asperger's was just that the relationships between addiction and the personality characteristics that we examined suggested that [massively multiplayer online role-playing games] might be addictive to people with Asperger's--and I tried to emphasize the 'might' to reporters--since the relationships between the addiction indices we used and the personality traits that we looked at suggested such a possibility," Charlton said.

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6189003.html

Posted: Apr 14th 2008 2:49PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks for the added clarification Cameron. I figured there had to be more to this than most press sites were reporting. It's not unusual for the press to latch onto the sensation grabbing headline and chuck out the context of the content.

Still, if he was quoted accurately, it's a big generalization that's going to ruffle some feathers.

It'd be great if the study and its results were made public at some point.
Reply

Posted: Apr 14th 2008 3:12PM GRT said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Interesting timing, I was just reading this on Computerworld:

Asperger's and IT: Dark secret or open secret?
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9072119

So gamers and IT people so far... what other categories can we get into the Asperger's pool before the month runs out!? :)

Posted: Apr 14th 2008 3:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Too late, Pools Closed.
Reply

Posted: Apr 14th 2008 3:33PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not going to draw my own conclusions from the study, but I will speak from my own empirical circumstances.

One of my close friends suffers from Asperger's, and it affects him more than I'll probably ever understand. But he finds solace in MMOs because he isn't expected to pick up on social cues like facial expressions or subtleties to understand what's going on. It's easier for him.

So I'd rather not think that OMG, gamers are all undiagnosed Asperger's sufferers, but rather, hey, people with Asperger's gravitate towards online games because it allows them an avenue for social interactivity without complications.

Posted: Apr 14th 2008 3:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's been a rather known issue for quite a while that people with a significant interest in technology also tend to seem more Aspie than not, and there may well be an underlying reason for that, as the rates of autism spectrum disorders in Silicon Valley suggest.

It really wouldn't be surprising for those heavily interested in a field characterized by repetitive behavior and rewarding focused interest would be the same.

a highly intense and specialized area of interest, like dinosaurs

While that might occur, it's not, in my opinion, a very good example. Many normal male children focus on dinosaurs at some point or the other -- Calvin of Calvin and Hobbes was a rather good example of that particular time period.

The DSM-IV-TR definition of Asperger Sydrome requires that the repetitive or stereotyped behavior be so pervasive as to get in the way of normal social or professional development. A kid with Asperger's does not just show interest in dinosaurs; he or she might spend months or years reading about and greping each category of dinosaurs, preferring to do so rather than even play video games or outside, while not showing any interest in modern reptiles. A few examples I've seen included an individual that could list and name visual differences between every firearm Colt made in a length of twenty-plus years and a young man that could recite a pretty accurate description of quantum mechanics as related to the double-slit experiment and some related destructive interference experiments. Another was an 18-year-old that I first thought normal until he provided a fairly long and in-depth recitation of differences between one camera type and the next.

Posted: Apr 14th 2008 8:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have to say I do take issue with the way Aspergers Syndrome is presented in the article. I've gappled with AS for as far as I can recall and I can still function quite well as a human being, I might have difficulties here and then, but I definitely don't feel my mental state should be equated with mental retardation.

AS as described in this article is taken to an extreme, and inflated even further than that, to be described as borderline autistic is at the very least demeaning and insulting.

I'll cut my post short as all my efforts past here devolve into angry ranting.

Posted: Apr 14th 2008 10:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree... there's a difference between an intellectual disability and autism or Asperger's. To lump them together shows ignorance, not to mention calling them 'retards' and 'speshul.' I'm surprised this made it past any editorial process.
Reply

Posted: Apr 14th 2008 10:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I apologize if the post comes across as offensive to you. It was not my intent to demean anyone with AS, autism, or mental retardation.

My beef was really with the way the research of this particular study was presented in most of the online press I've seen regarding this study.

Despite the title and graphic used for this article, I think if you really read through the post you'll realize I'm not attacking anyone; I'm just calling into question the judgment of posting the results of research in such a half-assed way that readers will draw incorrect conclusions and assumptions as a result.
Reply

Posted: Apr 16th 2008 10:16AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just like my history professor has said; Sociologists coin a new phrase, do nothing to deepen our understanding of society, and go back into the soup line until they can find a real job.

Honestly, given enough money by someone who wants me to prove a point, I can create a scientifically 'sound' study that proves exactly what I want it to prove.

PS:

I love the counter arguments. Those researchers got rolled like a pair of bad forums trolls. :p

Featured Stories

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW