| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (7)

Posted: Mar 26th 2008 4:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I thought the roll-out of the trademark changes was well done. No one likes change in their game, but then trademark law being what it is I'm not sure there's a way to make people happy about forced legal change to their personal business practices which may or may nt have fallen within the allowed uses. And as for artistic comments about the mark, consider that LL has to get the design past the USPTO and that has a lot to do with how it can look in many cases; this is not a simple case of drawing up a cute mark.

Posted: Mar 26th 2008 5:59PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
None of it bothers me at all i truth, other than the inSL logo is uncreative and pretty boring-looking.

What makes me laugh though is the claim to any kind of 'right' to the stand-alone initials "SL". So - I have clarified my own blogs to mean "Seriously Laughing" Attitude and "Silly Little" Review - all because I simply refuse to put a ™ mark next to a pair of letters from the alphabet that I grew up understanding meant Sign Language.

Either way - this is just Linden Lab recording for the record. It is upon them to spot and then defend the marks. In other words, they have to take the initiative to prove an offense. I seriously doubt they will get anywhere with the "SL" claim.

So, though "inSL' is now a legal trademark, "in SL" is not.

Posted: Mar 26th 2008 10:21PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It's not so much taking ownership of those two letters. It's only in cases where they might be construed or interpreted as being related to Second Life -- whether they are or not is less important, I believe, than whether people might make that assumption.
Reply

Posted: Mar 26th 2008 6:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
...tried to improve the inSL-logo, too.
not much of a success, but at least, they cannot sue us for satire!
http://2ndtravel.blogspot.com/2008/03/sind-wir-in-sl.html

Posted: Mar 27th 2008 1:53AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I didn't have much of an adverse reaction to it, I immediately went and registered one of my groups, SL Public Land Preserve, since it seemed to fit their requirements for registration. I don't know if I want to use the ugly black "inSL" logo, however, but I see that as optional.

What I feel unsettled about is what it means in terms of making us feel as if our businesses, our work, is a toy, is housed within another company's product, and not really free from it. This might not bother a lot of people with small businesses. But the larger ones, like secondlifeherald.com and slexchange.com will be bothered and I wonder how it will play out.

I don't think you can reliably claim that there are "all these people" who use the eye/hand logo. Of course, the Linden's didn't seek Fatiman's permission for using her famous hand lol, but their particular cartoony take on it is uniquely theirs, they've always policed that inworld, and only a tiny handful of people had special agreements with them to use it on, say, t-shirts or something. It isn't at all widespread.

Posted: Mar 27th 2008 7:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Not entirely unique. I have that same logo (in brown) on a shoe box for a pair of shoes I bought in the early 90s, and a similar logo also appears as the logo for a local tv gardening show.
Reply

Posted: Mar 27th 2008 7:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The trick here is that trademarks are in reference to something. The eye-in-hand logo is quite a common one, used for a variety of things. It's just that Linden Lab owns it in circumstances where it might be associated with virtual worlds.

Whatever happens when that shoe company wants to open a virtual worlds presence? I don't know. Everything explodes, I guess.

Featured Stories

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW