| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (4)

Posted: Jan 20th 2008 1:00PM Grizz said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm glad they will keep the bare breasts in. This is not Leisure Suit Larry, if you read any of Robert E. Howards novels you would agree with me wholly. The hypnotizing way he describes scantly dressed amazon beauties is beautiful, artistic, and respectful.

But on the other side this IS an adult game, and it is the responsibility of stores to check ID's and parents to...well...parent.
Reply

Posted: Jan 20th 2008 2:01PM GRT said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Didn't Funcom say that they were going to tailor the content based on IP address? So if you have an IP address out of N.A. you get tamed down content, but European's will get the full monty, so to speak.

I have to agree with Gr1zz... if you read Conan, you'll find a gritty world full of violence and sex, and to "cleanse" that really washes out the IP... why do a Conan game if you're going to make it 'safe' (and thus not really Conan)? May as well say on the licensing and do something new.
Reply

Posted: Jan 20th 2008 3:39PM Durinthal said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If you like widespread character customization for skills and the like, why not do away with classes altogether? That's what I'd like to see.
Reply

Posted: Jan 20th 2008 6:32PM GRT said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Most of the arguments I've seen against classless systems is the fear that every character ends up the same once the min/maxers figure out what the 'best' selection of skills are.

I'm not saying I personally agree with that argument, but that's the one I've seen most often used against the idea.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW