| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (6)

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 12:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Personally I never saw much point in giving money to an ungoverned party to 'hold' and 'gain interest' on. I wouldn't trust anyone to it in RL and sure as hell wouldn't trust anyone in SL to do it either.

As such, this ban doesn't really effect me much except in terms of the search for land, which may or may not change depending on whether these companies just *stop* investing in land or continue under other pretenses (in which case they may find their customer base rather unhappy with them when they cannot liquidate their assets in an appropriate amount of time).

Given that some 'investment' companies have interests in land within SL, how do you think this will affect the land market?
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 3:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One could put one's money into a high-interest account, or give it to some sort of more risky investment firm to handle (there seem to be an increasing number, at least in this country, willing to deal with relatively small initial funds, but they are of course all regulated in some way). One could put it into the stock market oneself if one was so inclined.

I don't really think that the lack of options is what is motivating people to place money with these folk, and then defend them until the boat has well and truly sailed (and sometimes even after that). I am not sure quite _what_ it is to be honest, but I'm sure that there are plenty of studies about investment scams over the centuries; they don't seem to be becoming less popular.

The only thing that I might be able to add to those is to speculate what about SL might contribute. A factor may be that people are not infrequently attracted by promises of big money (not entirely unrelated to LL press) and at least, by the idea that it is a "money game". They enter and see the banks and think "oh yes, this is part of the game". They are used to banking regulations without even thinking about them, and assume that nobody would be allowed to get away with making promises they can't keep and then defaulting. Surely not! They're in the game, they must be part of the game! Just like new residents often assume that people with a tag saying "Police" _are_ actually some sort of SL police force.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 3:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One could put one's money into a high-interest account, or give it to some sort of more risky investment firm to handle (there seem to be an increasing number, at least in this country, willing to deal with relatively small initial funds, but they are of course all regulated in some way). One could put it into the stock market oneself if one was so inclined.

I don't really think that the lack of options is what is motivating people to place money with these folk, and then defend them until the boat has well and truly sailed (and sometimes even after that). I am not sure quite _what_ it is to be honest, but I'm sure that there are plenty of studies about investment scams over the centuries; they don't seem to be becoming less popular.

The only thing that I might be able to add to those is to speculate what about SL might contribute. A factor may be that people are not infrequently attracted by promises of big money (not entirely unrelated to LL press) and at least, by the idea that it is a "money game". They enter and see the banks and think "oh yes, this is part of the game". They are used to banking regulations without even thinking about them, and assume that nobody would be allowed to get away with making promises they can't keep and then defaulting. Surely not! They're in the game, they must be part of the game! Just like new residents often assume that people with a tag saying "Police" _are_ actually some sort of SL police force.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 8:26PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I trust the "bank" that I used to have money in in SL, I only withdrawed it all in case for some reason, by the time the ban started something would make it hard for me to get my money back.

it didn't had the absurd interest rates most banks in SL have, that, combined with advice from smart people aswell as how long it has been out there, the scale of the company and other stuff like that, made me confident that it should be trusted, and if ater the 22 they manage to get back on busyness, I'll put my money in it, regardless of my trust on whichever regulatory agency that allowed them to continue
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 8:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
ordinal i was looking forward to reading three nice long comments by you..... they're all the same tho. hahah.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2008 11:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't think land will be considerably affected by it. I don't think there was all that much land-flipping-for-profit as an interest model for banks.

Linden Lab is likely to take a bit of a revenue hit, though - assuming the user-run banks were doing with the funds what they claimed to be doing.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW