The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 152 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 80 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 76 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Jan 2nd 2008 11:10PM GreenArmadillo said
Whether it's implementing a new teleportation system that devalues locations near the old hubs, banning a currently valid use of virtual property with no notice or compensation (I'm not saying the decision to ban casinos was wrong, but the decision certainly affected peoples' assets), or now allowing fraud by OTHER people to cost you cash, SL property is simply unstable in ways that real world property isn't.
My question is simple: Why is anyone comfortable "owning" anything under such terms? Apparently people are, but my reaction, if someone handed me anything of value in SL, would be to cash out as quickly as possible before the Lindens can strike again.