The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 152 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 76 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 70 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Dec 31st 2007 1:27AM (Unverified) said
While there was some fear of market crash, some designers/builders/scripters doesn't want to admit such loss effect to market ground transaction would have to force them to lower their prices. Not that they should... If we all do, then we would lose about 35% or more of Linden$ value.
Ideally for them to do is losing their land/rental spots than lowering their prices for where they could make monthly/weekly saving. Estate owners would have most effect with their pricing. Thus, Real Estate owners would need to drop about 1/3rd of their sims. In LL's Monthly Staistics Data for Land, Island growth rate had dropped from 55% to 36% since the ban.
"To save your Linden$ value, best to lose some land than lowering your prices" has been set into most people's mind. Estate owners didn't like that, Anshe Chung clearly didn't like that either due to her new rental term and fee rules change.