Second Life's Cory = Apple, Inc.'s Woz
Culture, Events, real-world, MMO industry, News items, Opinion, Second Life, Free-to-play
5
Cory (Ondrejka) Linden's leaving Linden Lab is the most grid-altering event this past year, and arguably of the past 2 years as well. And if I were to play the Nostradamus game, and I'm going to right now, then I'd say that Cory's headed for a life where he will eventually end up forming his own Segway polo pony league.
Cory Ondrejka is Second Life's Steve Wozniak. He's the technology guru/wizard who helped write the code that made the grid what it is today. Many think of Cory and Philip as integral entities of Linden Lab, the same way people used to think of Woz and Steve Jobs for Apple, Inc. Cory is the tech guy with the answers, Philip is the front man with the charisma. And if we follow this line of reasoning, we can envision a future where, without Cory's support, LL will eventually run aground, bogged down by poorly-differentiated versions of its flagship product, causing Philip to leave the company in favor of putting his boyish good looks behind a virtual world competitor, only to return years later to save the beleaguered company like the prophesied King Arthur to Britain.
Cory will be just fine, and will probably be less stressed out, gain a few more pounds, and continue to see his popularity among geeks grow to near-legendary status. Maybe he'll get a tiny avenue named after him someday, or even, if Philip would have its cultural influence, get to star in an exhibit in animatronic form. Cory, good luck with whatever you put your hand to, and we'll miss you.
Reader Comments (5)
Posted: Dec 12th 2007 11:53AM (Unverified) said
is the comment confirmation system borked? if not, where is my comment? it can't have been blocked cause of URLs, I only used 2 out of the 3 it says I can use.......... :/
Posted: Dec 12th 2007 11:59AM (Unverified) said
(second try to post this comment, lets see if the confirmation link works this time.....)
I-Second Life in the future? Xp
ps:would you guys mind changing Cory's picture? perhaps making the
logo smaller and putting it in his forehead, like those things (dunno
the name) some people have on India, or perhaps scaling the hand so
the eye matches his, and putting it over his left eye a bit like
Chakotay ( http://dqcafe.section-disparu.com/pictures/chakotay.jpg )
or Seven of Nine (
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/136/355432977_755e71aacd_o.jpg ), both
from StarTrek:Voyager
I-Second Life in the future? Xp
ps:would you guys mind changing Cory's picture? perhaps making the
logo smaller and putting it in his forehead, like those things (dunno
the name) some people have on India, or perhaps scaling the hand so
the eye matches his, and putting it over his left eye a bit like
Chakotay ( http://dqcafe.section-disparu.com/pictures/chakotay.jpg )
or Seven of Nine (
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/136/355432977_755e71aacd_o.jpg ), both
from StarTrek:Voyager
Posted: Dec 12th 2007 1:13PM (Unverified) said
For the uninitiated, could you explain exactly what the difference of opinion was that lead to Cory being fired?
I have an image of where SL should be going, but firing it's technical guru is not a hopeful sign.
However, being personally acquainted with SL's technical aspects, I can say that his firing might eventually be a good thing for the company, if it forces them to spend more money on creating a more professional, community-based approach to software improvements going forwards.
SL is technically a mess, designed and programmed by a genius, but also requiring a genius to get any real performance out of it.
So it's apparent that the argument was about the platform's future, closed vs open, corporate versus community. The question is, which viewpoint won the argument, and which one is on unemployment now?
I have an image of where SL should be going, but firing it's technical guru is not a hopeful sign.
However, being personally acquainted with SL's technical aspects, I can say that his firing might eventually be a good thing for the company, if it forces them to spend more money on creating a more professional, community-based approach to software improvements going forwards.
SL is technically a mess, designed and programmed by a genius, but also requiring a genius to get any real performance out of it.
So it's apparent that the argument was about the platform's future, closed vs open, corporate versus community. The question is, which viewpoint won the argument, and which one is on unemployment now?
Posted: Dec 12th 2007 1:40PM (Unverified) said
Agreed, absolutely. It's great that Cory got SL this far, but I think it's also clear that some serious changes are needed for to continue forwards. I just hope that this makes it more likely we'll see them, rather than less...
Reply
Posted: Dec 12th 2007 4:10PM (Unverified) said
The first time I got to hang out with Cory (other than walking by him while he was on the phone in San Fran) was at State of Play III in New York. We ended up at a karaoke bar, and it was near Halloween; Cory had a small pumpkin he drew a face on, and would hold it up, saying "I AM THE METAVERSE!" in a horrible screeching voice.
One of my favorite moments, as it felt like SL in RL. Best of luck to Cory, not like he'll need it. :)
One of my favorite moments, as it felt like SL in RL. Best of luck to Cory, not like he'll need it. :)
Featured Stories
Hyperspace Beacon: Four reasons in-character reporting is good for SWTOR
Posted on May 22nd 2012 12:00PM






