| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (6)

Posted: Nov 3rd 2007 9:28PM Ghen said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Second life stories make me say WTF... how is this a game that entertains?
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2007 9:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Many, including me, would say SL is not a game - it has none of the structures of a traditional game. It is easiest to define it by its very name: It's much more like a second life, with structures and activities that are basically 100% your choice.

Becoming part of the SL economy is not required, although very few people don't shop at least occasionally in my experience. Becoming involved in the economy at the sort of level of stock exchanges, banks etc. is certainly a minority activity - just like in real life - but it's obviously of interest to some.

What makes Second Life gripping? I don't think there is a single answer to that. My answers about why I'm still in SL have changed over the 3+ years I've been there. And I've been in SL basically on a daily basis over all of that period.

One of the reasons I would say has persisted is the contacts with people, the friendships and the like, so the social networking if you want a posh term. But it's more than just that - facebook and the like don't do it for me - there's something about that 3D presence as well which makes it more compelling. Although not for everyone, one of the additional things in the mix for me is that I work in SL, about 90% of my RL income comes from working in SL, but this hasn't been a consideration for all of the time.

I'm sure if you ask our other SL writers, you'll get different answers though.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2007 10:09PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've run a little story on this as well -

http://www.sloz.info/2007/11/04/world-stock-exchange-the-latest-controversy/

I really do feel that until there's some sort of regulation, the whole financial in Sl, it's all a joke - just not a funny one.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2007 9:46PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm inclined to agree Lowell, although getting regulation will require some significant changes at LL.

If I can avoid giving information as a CEO to tie to me personally, and so avoid responsibility, or make it hard to assign, why would I not do so? I guess I'd have to add, I certainly wouldn't do so if I intended to defraud people, but most of our financial regulations are really to force compliance, however ineffectively.

An Australian friend of my commented that running a Stock Exchange in Australia is illegal without some form of licensing. Could you comment on that?
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2007 10:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Eloise - yes my understanding is that stock exchanges in Australia are heavily licensed / regulated. I imagine that's why Luke is so insistent on WSE being a game.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2007 10:58PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nevertheless, the WSE still almost certainly infringes on federal regulation.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW